http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/06/13/the-iphone-sdk/ We celebrate all facets of geekiness, including Tech Geek, Science Geek and Gaming Geek... coming to you straight from Boston. Sun, 23 Nov 2008 12:30:58 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/06/13/the-iphone-sdk/#comment-65187 BigRemy Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:11:49 +0000 http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/06/13/the-iphone-sdk/#comment-65187 Why does I always get the impression that Jobs hates 3rd party programmers? Why does I always get the impression that Jobs hates 3rd party programmers?

]]> http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/06/13/the-iphone-sdk/#comment-65152 Dave Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:40:25 +0000 http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/06/13/the-iphone-sdk/#comment-65152 Oh, no doubt. I mean, I think the only way to piss people off more than that would have been to say that development would have to be done on Microsoft's <a href='http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/xna/default.aspx' rel="nofollow">XNA</a>. Oh, no doubt. I mean, I think the only way to piss people off more than that would have been to say that development would have to be done on Microsoft’s XNA.

]]> http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/06/13/the-iphone-sdk/#comment-65147 Colin Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:15:57 +0000 http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/06/13/the-iphone-sdk/#comment-65147 And, everyone expected a locked-down device heading into WWDC. But, when Almighty Steve mentions a development solution for 3rd party developers on the iPhone during a WWDC keynote... I think we end up being a little disappointed at the solution being to develop websites. And, everyone expected a locked-down device heading into WWDC. But, when Almighty Steve mentions a development solution for 3rd party developers on the iPhone during a WWDC keynote… I think we end up being a little disappointed at the solution being to develop websites.

]]> http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/06/13/the-iphone-sdk/#comment-65139 Dave Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:16:50 +0000 http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/06/13/the-iphone-sdk/#comment-65139 I think probably the big thing here was limiting access to the iphone proper, to keep the filthy hackers off of it. I think probably the big thing here was limiting access to the iphone proper, to keep the filthy hackers off of it.

]]> http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/06/13/the-iphone-sdk/#comment-65135 iNut Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:44:19 +0000 http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/06/13/the-iphone-sdk/#comment-65135 R U SERIOUS! Argh! "Kinda Lame?" It is totally lame. My only guess is that Jobs wanted to get the iPhone out there, it's been in development long-enough, and a full-featured SDK can come later. It's like being in beta forever, you just can't do it; if you want to actually make cash on your product you have to roll it out a some point, even if it does not have all the things you wanted it to have. R U SERIOUS! Argh! “Kinda Lame?” It is totally lame. My only guess is that Jobs wanted to get the iPhone out there, it’s been in development long-enough, and a full-featured SDK can come later. It’s like being in beta forever, you just can’t do it; if you want to actually make cash on your product you have to roll it out a some point, even if it does not have all the things you wanted it to have.

]]>