<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BostonGeek Podcast:  Episode 64</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/</link>
	<description>We celebrate all facets of geekiness, including Tech Geek, Science Geek and Gaming Geek... coming to you straight from Boston.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 11:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ldmvkteskn</title>
		<link>http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/#comment-69762</link>
		<dc:creator>ldmvkteskn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 14:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/#comment-69762</guid>
		<description>Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! iqcmbhcykcxuy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! iqcmbhcykcxuy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/#comment-31314</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 15:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/#comment-31314</guid>
		<description>Oh, and there's a &lt;a href='http://www.boston.com/business/articles/2007/01/24/filling_in_gaps_on_the_data_breach/' rel="nofollow"&gt;Q&#38;A&lt;/a&gt; up on boston.com asking the actual relevant questions about what TJX stores, and what people need to do if they're concerned their information may have been stolen.

Great sequence of questions to start if off, btw.

&lt;blockquote&gt;
Q. Why do retailers keep  credit card numbers on file?

A. Most merchants have technology to capture transactional information, including credit and debit card numbers, and driver's license numbers for checks. They're required to keep that as part of their business records and proof of purchase, according to Karl Bjornson , a retail specialist with consultancy Kurt Salmon Associates.

Stores need to be able to tie the customer to the credit card payment system so they can collect the money, Bjornson said, and have the data if customers or banks challenge a charge.

Q. Should consumers store their credit or debit card numbers electronically with online retailers such as Amazon?

A. "I would never do that," Bjornson said. "I don't trust anyone with my credit card numbers."
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So, in other words, you're a fucking idiot.  You just said that any company you buy something with a debit/credit card from has to keep that information for a number of different reasons.  What difference, then, does being able to take advantage of that fact to avoid reentering your credit info make, exactly?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and there&#8217;s a <a href='http://www.boston.com/business/articles/2007/01/24/filling_in_gaps_on_the_data_breach/' rel="nofollow">Q&amp;A</a> up on boston.com asking the actual relevant questions about what TJX stores, and what people need to do if they&#8217;re concerned their information may have been stolen.</p>
<p>Great sequence of questions to start if off, btw.</p>
<blockquote><p>
Q. Why do retailers keep  credit card numbers on file?</p>
<p>A. Most merchants have technology to capture transactional information, including credit and debit card numbers, and driver&#8217;s license numbers for checks. They&#8217;re required to keep that as part of their business records and proof of purchase, according to Karl Bjornson , a retail specialist with consultancy Kurt Salmon Associates.</p>
<p>Stores need to be able to tie the customer to the credit card payment system so they can collect the money, Bjornson said, and have the data if customers or banks challenge a charge.</p>
<p>Q. Should consumers store their credit or debit card numbers electronically with online retailers such as Amazon?</p>
<p>A. &#8220;I would never do that,&#8221; Bjornson said. &#8220;I don&#8217;t trust anyone with my credit card numbers.&#8221;
</p></blockquote>
<p>So, in other words, you&#8217;re a fucking idiot.  You just said that any company you buy something with a debit/credit card from has to keep that information for a number of different reasons.  What difference, then, does being able to take advantage of that fact to avoid reentering your credit info make, exactly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/#comment-31242</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/#comment-31242</guid>
		<description>Think it's spelled Inara, fwiw.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think it&#8217;s spelled Inara, fwiw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/#comment-31241</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/#comment-31241</guid>
		<description>Strange thing - I let Linda listen to the podcast last night, and when you suggested Enara, Linda mentioned that when we'd watched Serenity, she'd really liked that name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strange thing - I let Linda listen to the podcast last night, and when you suggested Enara, Linda mentioned that when we&#8217;d watched Serenity, she&#8217;d really liked that name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/#comment-31240</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/#comment-31240</guid>
		<description>I was actually going to suggest Kaylee as a name when Em and I were talking about it, but her uncle's girlfriend has a Kailee (not sure how she spells it).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was actually going to suggest Kaylee as a name when Em and I were talking about it, but her uncle&#8217;s girlfriend has a Kailee (not sure how she spells it).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Remy</title>
		<link>http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/#comment-31239</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Remy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/#comment-31239</guid>
		<description>Yeah I tend to fast forward now until I hear spoken words since I'm too impatient to sit through the 3 minute long intro.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I tend to fast forward now until I hear spoken words since I&#8217;m too impatient to sit through the 3 minute long intro.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/#comment-31238</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/#comment-31238</guid>
		<description>Nah, if this was Caligula-world, we'd just put the DJs in the head-mowing yard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nah, if this was Caligula-world, we&#8217;d just put the DJs in the head-mowing yard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/#comment-31234</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/#comment-31234</guid>
		<description>Not that I don't love the intros, but it's nearly three minutes before you guys start with the actual podcast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that I don&#8217;t love the intros, but it&#8217;s nearly three minutes before you guys start with the actual podcast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/#comment-31231</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/#comment-31231</guid>
		<description>And, being a hopeful person, I watched BSG, despite the 2nd half of the 2nd season being 99% crap, all the up way until about 5 minutes into the boxing episode.  At which point I removed the recording from my ReplayTV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, being a hopeful person, I watched BSG, despite the 2nd half of the 2nd season being 99% crap, all the up way until about 5 minutes into the boxing episode.  At which point I removed the recording from my ReplayTV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/#comment-31229</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/#comment-31229</guid>
		<description>Yes, groundless arguments shall have their &#60; &#62; characters banished to purgatory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, groundless arguments shall have their &lt; &gt; characters banished to purgatory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/#comment-31228</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/#comment-31228</guid>
		<description>yeah, that's the stuff...forgot my semicolons.

Firefly &#62; Farscape &#62; Heroes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, that&#8217;s the stuff&#8230;forgot my semicolons.</p>
<p>Firefly &gt; Farscape &gt; Heroes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/#comment-31227</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/#comment-31227</guid>
		<description>bugger

a &#62; b, maybe?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bugger</p>
<p>a &gt; b, maybe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/#comment-31225</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/#comment-31225</guid>
		<description>Seriously, we're still discussing the merits of BSG after the fucking shambles of the second half of the second season and the first half of the third?  Did everyone but me miss the boxing episode?  The "hostages in a bar" episode?

IMO, Firefly &#62; Farscape &#62; Heroes is really the only things we need to be arguing about at this point.  And to be fair, I don't know for sure that the Whedon could have sustained that level on Firefly for several seasons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously, we&#8217;re still discussing the merits of BSG after the fucking shambles of the second half of the second season and the first half of the third?  Did everyone but me miss the boxing episode?  The &#8220;hostages in a bar&#8221; episode?</p>
<p>IMO, Firefly &gt; Farscape &gt; Heroes is really the only things we need to be arguing about at this point.  And to be fair, I don&#8217;t know for sure that the Whedon could have sustained that level on Firefly for several seasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Remy</title>
		<link>http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/#comment-31224</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Remy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/#comment-31224</guid>
		<description>That's because it knows your arguments are groundless. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s because it knows your arguments are groundless. <img src='http://www.bostongeek.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/#comment-31222</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/#comment-31222</guid>
		<description>Aack! It interpreted my greater and lesser signs as HTML tags and cut them out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aack! It interpreted my greater and lesser signs as HTML tags and cut them out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/#comment-31221</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/#comment-31221</guid>
		<description>Firefly  Trek TNG
4400 &#62; BSG
4400 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefly  Trek TNG<br />
4400 &gt; BSG<br />
4400</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Remy</title>
		<link>http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/#comment-31220</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Remy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/#comment-31220</guid>
		<description>My view, using Colin's mathy stuff

Firefly &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; BSG (I wasn't sure how to express infinitely greater than properly.)

Firefly greater or equal to Farscape.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My view, using Colin&#8217;s mathy stuff</p>
<p>Firefly &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; BSG (I wasn&#8217;t sure how to express infinitely greater than properly.)</p>
<p>Firefly greater or equal to Farscape.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/#comment-31214</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/#comment-31214</guid>
		<description>Firefly &gt; BSG
Firefly &gt; Farscape

No flamewar needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefly > BSG<br />
Firefly > Farscape</p>
<p>No flamewar needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Remy</title>
		<link>http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/#comment-31118</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Remy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 17:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/#comment-31118</guid>
		<description>Speaking of the Beer Fest, next time I'm up there or I'll see if I can make a trip without wife and child, there will have to be a BostonGeek Beer Fest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of the Beer Fest, next time I&#8217;m up there or I&#8217;ll see if I can make a trip without wife and child, there will have to be a BostonGeek Beer Fest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/#comment-31113</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 17:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/#comment-31113</guid>
		<description>A couple comments about this week's GameGeek Challenge:

-"ishdishion" - yeah, I don't even know how to spell it. It's kind of an homage to Gamespot's Hotspot podcast, where they used to say every week "Welcome to another ishdishion of The Hotspot". I thought maybe game-loving listeners might get the obscure reference.
-"Ear-scratchingly" - this is a reference to the GeeksOn podcast, which someone once called "Ear-scratchingly gay". The Geeks discussed and laughed about this at length.
-"Frelling" - how dare you defame Farscape? Best frelling SciFi show ever. I mean, I love Battlestar, I love Heroes, and I frelling love The 4400, but Farscape is the best of all of them. Firefly on the other hand, I wasn't a big fan of. Let the flamewars begin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple comments about this week&#8217;s GameGeek Challenge:</p>
<p>-&#8221;ishdishion&#8221; - yeah, I don&#8217;t even know how to spell it. It&#8217;s kind of an homage to Gamespot&#8217;s Hotspot podcast, where they used to say every week &#8220;Welcome to another ishdishion of The Hotspot&#8221;. I thought maybe game-loving listeners might get the obscure reference.<br />
-&#8221;Ear-scratchingly&#8221; - this is a reference to the GeeksOn podcast, which someone once called &#8220;Ear-scratchingly gay&#8221;. The Geeks discussed and laughed about this at length.<br />
-&#8221;Frelling&#8221; - how dare you defame Farscape? Best frelling SciFi show ever. I mean, I love Battlestar, I love Heroes, and I frelling love The 4400, but Farscape is the best of all of them. Firefly on the other hand, I wasn&#8217;t a big fan of. Let the flamewars begin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Remy</title>
		<link>http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/#comment-31112</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Remy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 16:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/#comment-31112</guid>
		<description>I too have done the LARP Greg, so you are not alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too have done the LARP Greg, so you are not alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/#comment-31110</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 16:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/#comment-31110</guid>
		<description>My comments about the 'cast:

-How about nicknaming Karl "Korny"?

-Colin, you should have known. Anything mixed with Yoohoo sucks. Yoohoo mixed with Yoohoo sucks.

-When we bought our cats, we almost named them Chiana and D'Argo. Can't do it for a human being though. Although we did consider the name "Arya", a character from George R.R. Martin's Song of Ice and Fire books.

-I've actually done the run-around-and-get-hit-in-the-head-with-foam-swords thing. Now that's some freaking exercise. Nothing beats the sensation of sneaking around in the woods on a moonless night and jumping out and scaring a guy so bad that he falls over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My comments about the &#8216;cast:</p>
<p>-How about nicknaming Karl &#8220;Korny&#8221;?</p>
<p>-Colin, you should have known. Anything mixed with Yoohoo sucks. Yoohoo mixed with Yoohoo sucks.</p>
<p>-When we bought our cats, we almost named them Chiana and D&#8217;Argo. Can&#8217;t do it for a human being though. Although we did consider the name &#8220;Arya&#8221;, a character from George R.R. Martin&#8217;s Song of Ice and Fire books.</p>
<p>-I&#8217;ve actually done the run-around-and-get-hit-in-the-head-with-foam-swords thing. Now that&#8217;s some freaking exercise. Nothing beats the sensation of sneaking around in the woods on a moonless night and jumping out and scaring a guy so bad that he falls over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russtopher</title>
		<link>http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/#comment-31109</link>
		<dc:creator>Russtopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 16:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/#comment-31109</guid>
		<description>The majority of vasectomies performed nowadays involve a multi-step procedure to sever the vas deferens, a section of it is also cut out to increase the distance between the cuts to discourage re-growth, and the cut ends are also cauterized and sealed off with metal clips. This has helped to greatly decrease the percentage of "naturally reversed" procedures. Would this all be done on an animal? Not sure, that may have just been the "snip and see ya later" procedure. Don't ask why I know all this, you can figure it out on your own :-) The multi-step procedure also pretty much assures you that the situation CANNOT be reversed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The majority of vasectomies performed nowadays involve a multi-step procedure to sever the vas deferens, a section of it is also cut out to increase the distance between the cuts to discourage re-growth, and the cut ends are also cauterized and sealed off with metal clips. This has helped to greatly decrease the percentage of &#8220;naturally reversed&#8221; procedures. Would this all be done on an animal? Not sure, that may have just been the &#8220;snip and see ya later&#8221; procedure. Don&#8217;t ask why I know all this, you can figure it out on your own <img src='http://www.bostongeek.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> The multi-step procedure also pretty much assures you that the situation CANNOT be reversed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Remy</title>
		<link>http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/#comment-31108</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Remy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 16:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/#comment-31108</guid>
		<description>Except for the first one I went to, I have never been a fan of the Beer Fests held by Beer Advocate.  The first one I went to was a German Beer Fest where it was $15 to get in, and that gave you 4 pints of beer and you could buy tokens to get more.  Anything above 6% ABV was a half pint.

Since then, they've gone to the $30 format but all the tastings are 4oz, which is just a waste of time in my opinion.  You really can't get into a beer with only 4oz. at a time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except for the first one I went to, I have never been a fan of the Beer Fests held by Beer Advocate.  The first one I went to was a German Beer Fest where it was $15 to get in, and that gave you 4 pints of beer and you could buy tokens to get more.  Anything above 6% ABV was a half pint.</p>
<p>Since then, they&#8217;ve gone to the $30 format but all the tastings are 4oz, which is just a waste of time in my opinion.  You really can&#8217;t get into a beer with only 4oz. at a time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Remy</title>
		<link>http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/#comment-31107</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Remy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 16:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostongeek.com/2007/01/22/bostongeek-podcast-episode-64/#comment-31107</guid>
		<description>My loins and I thank you for the congratulations</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My loins and I thank you for the congratulations</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
